MOLECULAR DOCKING OF ARYL SEMICARBAZONE AND ARYL THIOSEMICARBAZE DERIVATES AGAINST ENZYME KINASES

  • Author
  • George Torres de Lima
  • Co-authors
  • Abner Lins Dantas , Yasmim Meneses Silva , Dalci José Brondani , Rodrigo Ribeiro Alves Caiana , José Rivaldo de Lima , Elizabeth Fernanda de Oliveira Borba , Teresinha Gonçalves da Silva
  • Abstract
  •  

    MOLECULAR DOCKING OF ARYL SEMICARBAZONE AND ARYL THIOSEMICARBAZE DERIVATES AGAINST ENZYME KINASES

     

    George Torres de Lima1; Abner Lins Dantas1; Yasmim Meneses Silva1; José Dalci Brondani2; Rodrigo Ribeiro Alves Caiana1; José Rivaldo de Lima1; Elizabeth Fernanda de Oliveira Borba1; Teresinha Gonçalves da Silva1*.

    1 Departamento de Antibióticos, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.

    2 Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.

     

     

    george.torres@ufpe.br; teresinha.goncalves@ufpe.br

     

    ABSTRACT

    INTRODUCTION: Molecular docking strategies have stood out for investigating the binding affinity and relative orientation between a pharmacological target and a drug candidate, favoring the identification of promising compounds [1,2]. The success of these computational strategies highlights pharmacological targets with therapeutic potential, such as protein kinases [3, 4, 5]. These proteins play important physiological roles, such as gene transcription, cell cycle, cytoskeleton rearrangement, proliferation, differentiation, migration and cell death [6, 7]. Compounds structurally similar to those derived from aryl semicarbazones and aryl thiosemicarbazones have demonstrated the ability to interact with different kinases that are important for the treatment of cancer [4,9]. AIMS: To evaluate in silico, via molecular docking, the activity of two compounds (LSS4 and LSS6) with good cytotoxic activity for tumor cell lines, against kinase enzymes known for their involvement in the process of initiation and progression of cancer: cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) and casein kinase 1 (CK1?/?), METHODS: Docking obtained from Autodock 4.1, binders prepared from Avogrado 1.2.0 and AutoDockTools-1.5.6 package. Protein structures (.pdb) were obtained from the Protein Data Bank and prepared in AutoDock. Coordinates are defined from the grid box, based on the active site carrying the co-crystallized giants of each enzyme. The established parameters were validated by redocking the co-crystallized giants to calculate the RMSD. Visual interpretation obtained from Discovery Studio. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: It was possible to perform the visual interpretation and calculation of the degree of three-dimensional similarity existing between the atoms of the molecules from the Root Mean Standard Deviation (RMSD) value, with RMSD values ??obtained of ? 2, which configures as a value acceptable for carrying out the simulations [CDK2 (RMSD 0.47), DYRK1A (RMSD 1.18) and CK1?/? (RMSD 0.44)]. The free energy values ??of the compounds against CDK2, DYRK1A and CK1?/? were calculated and the results showed that the compounds were able to form energetically favorable complexes with the active sites of the addressed protein kinases, presenting low values ??of binding free energies [LSS4: CDK2 (-6.49), DYRK1A (-6.37), CK1?/? (-7.26)], [LSS6: CDK2 (-7.23), DYRK1A (-7.14), CK1? /? (-7.63). CONCLUSION: The low binding free energy values, the absence of unfavorable interactions and the interaction with different amino acid residues point to the potential of these compounds and their derivatives to act as inhibitors of these and/or other protein kinases, corroborating what has been demonstrated in literature for thiosemicarbazones and its analogues, and encourage the development of new studies that may further explore the biological activities of these compounds.

     

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are grateful for the postgraduate scholarships Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE).

     

    Keywords: Molecular dynamics simulation, semicarbazones, kinases

     

    REFERENCES

    [1] SURABHI, S.; SINGH, B. K. Computer aided drug design: an overview. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, v. 8, n. 5, p. 504-509, 2018.

    [2] ROZADA, A.M.F.; RODRIGUES-VENDRAMINI, F.A.V.; GONÇALVES, D.S.; ROSA, F.A.; BASSO, E.A.; SEIXAS, F.A.V.; KIOSHIMA, E.S.; GAUZE, G.F. Synthesis and antifungal activity of new hybrids pyrimido[4,5 d]pyridazinone-N-acylhydrazones. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, v. 30, n. 14, p. 127244, 2020.RUDRAPAL, M.; CHETIA, D. Virtual screening, molecular docking and QSAR studies in drug discovery and development programme. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, v. 10, n. 4, p. 225-233, 2020.

    [3] REGGI, E.; DIVIANI, D. The role of A-kinase anchoring proteins in cancer development. Cellular Signalling, v. 40, p. 143-155, 2017.

    [4] CRUZ, A. C. N. da et al. Biological evaluation of arylsemicarbazone derivatives as potential anticancer agents. Pharmaceuticals, v. 12, n. 4, p. 169, 2019.

    [5] HUANG, L.; JIANG, S.; SHI, Y.. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors for solid tumors in the past 20 years (20012020). Journal of hematology & oncology, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2020.

    [6] ROTHWEILER, U.; ERIKSSON, J.; STENSEN, W.; LEESON, F.; ENGH, R.A.; SVENDSEN, J.S. Luciferin and derivatives as a DYRK selective scaffold for the design of protein kinase inhibitors. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, v. 94, p. 140-148, 2015.

    [7] ASSADIESKANDAR, A.; YU, C.; MAISONNEUVE, P.; LIU, X.; CHEN, Y.; PRAKASH, G.K.S.; KURINOV, I.; SICHERI, F.; XHANG, C. Effects of rigidity on the selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors. European journal of medicinal chemistry, v. 146, p. 519-528, 2018.

    [8] ÁGUILA, I.; ANTONIA-MENDIOLA, M.A.; PRADHAN, S.; SINHA, C.; LÓPEZ-TORRES, E. Synthesis, characterization, in vitro cytotoxic activity and molecular docking of dinuclear gold (I) complexes with terephthalaldehyde bis (thiosemicarbazones). Polyhedron, v. 210, p. 115498, 2021.

     

  • Keywords
  • Molecular dynamics simulation, semicarbazones, kinases
  • Modality
  • Pôster
  • Subject Area
  • Quimioinformatics, Bioinformatics and TheoreticalChemistry
Back
  • Biology, Pharmacology and Physiology
  • Drug Design and Discovery, Synthesis and Natural Products
  • Quimioinformatics, Bioinformatics and TheoreticalChemistry

Comissão Organizadora

Francisco Mendonça Junior
Pascal Marchand
Teresinha Gonçalves da Silva
Isabelle Orliac-Garnier
Gerd Bruno da Rocha

Comissão Científica

Ricardo Olimpio de Moura